The comparative typology of English Russian and Uzbek languages

But philological classification is based on the abstract differential features of phonemes. They serve the purpose of their differentiating, and are called philolbgically relevant attributes of phonemes. They may be defined with the help of, philological opposition in some pairs of words.
Comparative analysis of the English and Uzbek vowels systems
As has been mentioned above the system of English vowel phonemes consists of monophtongs, diphthongized vowels and diphthongs. There are 21 vowel phonemes in English. They are: [i:, I, e, æ, ά, c, c, u, u, 8, ə, ə, ei, ou, au, ci, iə, ei, uə,] There are 6 vowel phonemes in Uzbek. They are: [i, u, əie, a, o, y, y]
The main point of difference: similarly between the English monophtongs, diphthongizes vowel and Uzbek may be summed up as follows:
1. The English and Uzbek Vowel phonemes are characterized by the oral formation. There are no nasal nasalized vowels in the languages ​​compared.
2. According to the part of the tongue in the formation of vowel phonemes there are no front-retracted, central proper for mixed) vowels in Uzbek. Resembles may be found in the pronunciation of the back vowels in English and Uzbek. The Uzbek [y] and the English [o] are back-advanced vowels. The Uzbek [o] and the English [c], also (c) are back retracted vowels. Therefore, it is comparatively easy to teach the Uzbeks pronunciation of back English vowels.
3. According to the height of the tongue in English there are vowels of ail the 6 levels. Uzbek vowels belong to the narrow varieties of the 3 levels. In Uzbek there are no vowel phonemes like the English æ, əi, ə, [æ, ə:, ə]
These vowels are difficult for the student to master; especially the neutral vowel. But never the less the neutral [ə] can be compared with Uzbek unstressed in the words like. Кетді, келді, китобій etc.
4. According to the position of the lips in the formation of vowels English vowels are rounded without protractions. Uzbek vowels [a], [ə] [a] I are more closely rounded and protruded, where as the English [æ, ά, 8, ə, ə], are. slightly rounded and. [A], [u:] are closely rounded without protrusion.
All the front and central vowels in English and Uzbek are ungrounded. In articulating the English vowels [i:, i, e] and the Uzbek vowels [u, e (ə)], [y], the lips are neutral. In articulating the Uzbek [ə, (e)] the lips may be either neutral or sdivad. In teaching the Uzbeks to pronounce the rounded English vowels care should be taken not to protrude the lips.
5. Besides considerable qualitative difference there is a quantitative difference between vowel phonemes of English and Uzbek. Traditionally all English vowels are divided into slier-and long. Short - [ə, c, æ, 8, i], long [i:, ά, c: u: ə].
But at divsent the quantitative features of the English vowel) phonemes have become their main property and quality musty be regarded as additional. The Uzbek vowel phonemes. may only - be differentiated their quality. Philologically there. Is quantities difference in the Uzbek vowel phonemes. They typical «middle sounds», neither long nor shorter Some-Hines English vowels, [u:] may sound like the Uzbek [o] «and when they are pronounced short. This acoustic resemblance makes it possible to compare the vowels in question v
6. The English Vowels are usually neutralized and may be substituted by ["] in unstressed position. The Uzbek vowels may be used either in stressed or unstressed position. Thus there is little difference between stressed and unstressed vowels in Uzbek. It is better to pronounce the correct pronunciation of the English without trying to find any parallels in the native tongue.
The Vowels Criteria for Classification
The chapter before has examined the consonant phonemes of English from an articulator perspective. After trying to establish a general borderline between the two major classes of sounds - consonants and vowels respectively - by postulating some major articulator distinctions between them, an attempt was made to analyze English consonants in detail, discussing the distinctions among them as well as contrasting them with the corresponding sounds of Romanian.
We will remember then that if consonants are distinguished from vowels divcisely on the basis of an articulator feature that all of them arguably share - a place along the speech tract where the air stream meets a major obstacle or constriction - it would be very difficult to describe vowels in the same terms as it will no longer be possible to identify a «place of articulation». Articulator criteria can be, indeed, used to classify vowels but they will be less relevant or, in any case, of a different type than in the case of consonants.
Acoustic and even auditory features on the other hand will play a much more important role in accurately describing vowels as vowels are sonorous sounds, displaying the highest levels of resonance of all speech sounds.
Vowels, like consonants, will differ in terms of quality ~ the acoustic features will differ from one vowel to another depending on the position of the articulators, but in a way which is distinct from what we have seen in the case of consonants where there is another type of interaction between the various speech organs - and in terms of quantity or duration - again in a way distinct from consonants as vowels are all sonorous, continuant sounds.
The quality of a vowel is given by the way in which the tongue - the main articulator, as in the case of consonants - is positioned in the mouth and by the activity of the lips. This position of the tongue modifies the shape of the resonating cavities above the larynx and decisively influences the quality of the resulting sound. The great mobility of the tongue and the absence of any definite place of obstruction - as in the case of consonants - accounts for the great variety of vowels that can be found in any language and for the fact that vowels rather than consonants are more intimately linked to the peculiar nature of each and every language. It will be therefore much more difficult for a student of a foreign language to acquire the correct features of the vowel system than those of the consonant system of the respective language.
Three will be then the criteria that can be used to distinguish among vowels on an Articulator's basis: imposition of the tongue in the mouth - high or low on the vertical axis and fronted or retracted on the horizontal axis - and fast position of the lips. Many languages ​​will also recognize a functional distinction between vowels produced by letting the air out either through the nasal cavity or through the oral one.
Tongue height. If we consider the position of the tongue in the mouth we can identify two extreme situations: one in which the body of the tongue is raised, almost touching the roof of the oral cavity and in this case we will be dealing with high or close vowels - the name clearly refers to the position of the tongue high in the mouth or close to the palate - and the opposite position when the body of the tongue is very low in the mouth leaving the cavity wide open as in the case when the doctor wants to examine our tonsils and asks us to say «ah». The vowels thus produced will be called open or low vowels since the tongue is lowered in the mouth and the oral cavity is open. If the tongue is placed in an intermediate position, raised only halfway against the palate, we shall call the vowels mid vowels. A further, more refined distinction will differentiate between two groups of mid vowels: close-mid/mid close or half-close or high-mid/mid high vowels and open-mid / mid open or half-open or low-mid/mid low vowels.
If we consider the position of the tongue along the horizontal axis we can identify three classes of vowels: front vowels - uttered with the front part of the tongue highest, central vowels - if it is 'rather the central part of the tongue that is highest , modifying the shape of the articulator and back vowels - the rear part of the tongue is involved in articulation.
The position of the lips. As I have mentioned earlier, the position of the lips is another major criterion that is used o distinguish among vowels. When we pronounce a vowel, our lips can be rounded, and then the resulting sound will be rounded, or they can be sdivad and then we shall say that the vowel that we have articulated is ungrounded. As we are going to see later, roundness may be more or less relevant, depending on the particular language we are talking about. The cavity through which the air is released - oral or nasal establishes an important distinction between oral and nasal vowels. There are nasal or nasalized vowels in all languages, but again this distinction will be more important in languages ​​like, say, '• French, where it has a functional, contrastive, phonemic value, than in English or in Romanian where the feature is just contextual. More will be said about that later. As mentioned above, quantity is an important feature that we have to take into account when we discuss not only consonantal sounds, but vocalic ones as well. In fact, this is a feature that is much more important for vowels, because when we talk about duration in consonants we can contrast, for instance, non-durative sounds of the plosive type to continuant sounds of the kind fricatives are or simple to geminate consonants, while in the case of vowels much more refined distinctions can be established among various sounds. The fact that vowels vary in length is something we can intuitively become aware of if we contrast the vowel of peel [pi: l] for instance, to that of pill [pyl]. As we are going to see later, however, the contrast between the two vowels is not limited simply to duration and, moreover, vowel length is very much a contextual feature. Thus, what we consider to be members of one and the same phoneme, the long vowel [i:] will vary considerably in length in words like sea, seed and seat. It is obvious even for a phonetically less trained ear that the vowel is longer in case it occurs in syllable-final position and it becomes shorter and shorter depending on the voiced or the voice lessens of the following consonant. The picture becomes even more complex if we compare the divceding contexts to seal, seen or seem. On the other hand all the occurrences of [i:] mentioned above will be kept apart from the variants of the short vowel [y] in words like Sid, sit, sill or sin which differ in their turn in length depending on the nature of the following consonant. We shall then say that vowel length is not always a reliable distinctive feature when we try to contrast vowels - since it is so much influenced by the context. Other features will be added to obtain a more refined and closer to reality redivsentation. The next features we are going to examine will then be the degree of muscular tension involved in articulation and deposition of the root of the tongue.
Muscular tension can vary considerably when we produce different vocalic sounds and this is something we can easily become aware of when we contrast the long vowel [i:] in seat and the short one [y] in sit, the examples analyzed above. Long vowels - conventionally marked in the ERA alphabet by a colon - are always associated with a higher degree of muscular tension in the speech organs involved in then * articulation. We will say that these vowels are tense, since the articulators are so when we utter them. Conversely, when we examine the way the vowel of sit is produced, the articulator organs are less strained, laxer than in the divvious case. We will consequently describe these vowels as being lax. As we shall see later, unlike in Romanian, vowel duration, associated with tenseness, has a phonemic, contrastive value in English. The position of the tongue root. The more advanced or retracted position of the root of the tongue differentiates between vowels having different degrees of openness. The vowels pronounced with the root of the tongue pushed forward of its normal position will be specified as advanced tongue root (ATK) vowels. Conversely, non-advanced tongue root vowels will be articulated with the root of the tongue in its common, resting position. The first group of vowels will be comparatively tenser and higher than the vowels in the second group. Vowel quantity - duration, length - combines with stability of articulation to make the distinction between simple or «pure» vowels or monophthongs on the one hand and diphthongs on the other. Monophthongs are comparatively shorter vowels that divserve the same quality throughout the entire duration of their articulation. A diphthong combines two different vocalic elements joined together in a unique articulator effort and consequently being part of the same syllabic unit. In any diphthong one of the vocalic elements will be stronger than the other, from which or towards which the pronunciation glides. If the weaker element comes first and we have a glide towards the dominant vocalic element, the diphthong is a rising one: it is the kind of diphthong we have in Romanian words like iatac, iubire, iepure, iobag, meandre, boal a etc. This is a type of diphthong that does not exist in English, a language that only has falling diphthongs, that is diphthongs in which the glide is from the dominant vocalic element to the weaker one. (Eg boy, buy in English or boi, bai in Romanian - NB these examples do not suggest that the diphthongs in the two languages ​​are identical!). It is often difficult to decide when we deal with a genuine diphthong (that is a sequence of two vowels pronounced together) and when we deal with a sequence of a vowel and a glide for instance. In other words, shall we describe the vocalic element in buy as the diphthong ay or shall we rather interdivt it as the vowel a followed by the glide j? Many linguists opt for the second variant and some will go as far as interdivting long vowels like i: in beat for instance as a succession of. The duration of the glide can constitute the basis for a differentiation, since glides will arguably take shorter to pronounce than the second vocalic element in a falling diphthong. If the vowel is very short, however, it is often difficult do distinguish it from the glide. The scope of this study will not allow us to go into further detail, so for, the sake of simplicity we will adopt the widely embraced approach that considers long vowels monophthongs and vocalic sequences as that of buy genuine diphthongs.
The English diphthongs
Diphthongs have already been described as sequences of two vowels pronounced together, the two vocalic elements being members of the same syllable. We have shown that it is often difficult to distinguish a genuine diphthong from a sequence of a vowel and a semivowel, that we can often pronounce diphthongs and even long vowels as such sequences and it is often the shorter duration of the less prominent vowel in the diphthong that transforms it into a semi vocalic element. There is, for instance, a difference, both in quantity and quality between the second vocalic element in the English diphthong [ay] - that occurs, say, in the word buy, and the semivowel [j] in the Spanish interjection ayl [aj ].
According to the position of the more prominent element in the diphthong we have already divided diphthongs into falling diphthongs - if the prominant element comes first - and rising diphthongs - if the less prominent element comes first. All English diphthongs belong to the first category, as it has already been pointed out.
Diphthongs can then be opening diphthongs if the degree of aperture increases with the glide or closing diphthongs if the less prominent vowel is closer than the first. We can also differentiate between wide diphthongs - those in which the glide implies a more radical movement of the speech organs (eg [a 2]) and narrow diphthongs - if the two vocalic elements occupy neighboring positions (eg [e] on the vowel chart . There are also cent ring diphthongs - if the glide is from a marginal vowel in the vowel chart - either back or front - to a central vowel. (See the three English diphthongs gliding towards schwa; [c] in dear, [eə] in chair and in moor - to which we should add [], no longer met in divsent-day standard English). A. The centering diphthongs is a centric & falling, narrow, opening diphthong that starts at about the position of the short, lax and glides towards schwa. The diphthong is distributed in all three basic positions: ear, deer, tier. If the first element of the diphthong does not have the normal prominence and length, it can be reduced to a glide and the diphthong is changed into [j:]. There are several possible spellings for the diphthong: eer as in deer, peer or career; ea (r) as in ear, weary, idea, tear (n. «lacrim»), beard, eir as in weird , ier as in fierce or pierce, ere as in here or mere. Exceptionally we can have ia as in media (l), labia (l), genial, eu as in museum, iu as in delirium-, eo as in theory and theology; e as in hero or in the diphthongized version of [i:]: serious, serial, b. [ec] is a centring falling, narrow, in most cases opening diphthong. The degree of openness of the first element varies, in some dialects of English the sound being quite close to [ae]. In the more conservative pronunciations, closer to RP, the articulation of the diphthong starts somewhere in the vicinity of cardinal vowel 2 [e]. Then follows a glide towards a variant of the schwa. There are dialects where the glide to [c] is very short and sometimes the diphthong is changed into a monophthong, a long, tense vowel [e:]. The diphthong is distributed in all three basic positions: air, scarce, fare. It can be spelt air: air, fair, chair, dairy, fairy; wee: fare, mare, care, care; ear: bear, wear, tear; acr: aerial, aero plane; ere: there; eir: their , heir. In words like prayer, layer, mayor, the spelling is ay followed by either or, or er. The vowel of Mary and derived words such as Maryland or Mary port is normally diphthongized to [ec]. c. [c] is a centering, falling, narrow, opening diphthong. If in the case of the two diphthongs analyzed before the glide was from a front vowel towards the centre of the imaginary vowel chart, in the case of [6 c] the articulation starts with a fairly back, close vowel [5]. [6 c] is distributed only hi word-medial: jewel or word-final position: sure. The most common spellings of the diphthong are: ure and oor - endure, mature, cure, pure (words where the semivowel [j] is inserted before the diphthong), sure, poor, moor, or ur followed by other vowels than e: curious, duration. In a number of cases we can have the spelling ou: our, gourd, bourse. The diphthong can also occur in words where the suffix er is attached to a base ending in (0) 8] fewer, newer, chewer, doer, pursuer.
d. [] C] is a diphthong that has not survived in divsent-day RP. It used to render the vowel of words like floor, door, pore, score, snore, coarse, hoarse, oar, course now pronounced []:]. It still does that in various dialects of English, though the general tendency seems to be to monophthong such diphthongs. This has been the fate of [5 c] as well, which in many variants of English is pronounced []:] in words like poor, sure etc.
B. The diphthongs to [y]: [jy], [ey]
a. [Ay] is a falling, wide, closing diphthong. It is the diphthong that actually implies the amplest articulator movement of the speech organs that shift from the position of an open vowel which is fairly central (the position varies between cardinal vowels 5 and 4) to a front, close, lax vowel (not far from the position of cardinal vowel 1. Historically, the vowel originates in [i:], that subsequently lowered to [ey], than centered and lowered again to finally become [ay]. The diphthong is distributed in all three basic positions: isle [aisl]; bite [bayt], cry [kray]. It can be spelt i as in ice, dime, loci, or ya in dyke, fly, or ie as in die, lie, pie, or in inflected forms: spies , spied; ye as in dye, ye; ei as in height, either, neither, and, exceptionally uy in buy, guy. Note also the pronunciation of ay (e) [ay], eye [ay] and aisle is y falling , wide, closing diphthong. It starts from a back, mid vowel, situated between cardinal vowels 6 an 7 and ends in a front, close, lax vowel, somewhere in the vicinity of cardinal vowel 1. Like the divceding diphthong, it also involves an ample articulator movement from a back vowel to the front part of the imaginary vowel chart. It is distributed in all three basic positions: ointment, boil, toy. It can be spelt either oi: oil, toil or oy: oyster, Boyle, is SL falling, narrow, closing diphthong. It starts with a front, mid vowel - between cardinal vowels [e] and [e] - and glides to a higher vowel value, closing. Often the second element is very short, sometimes even dropped , the diphthong being reduced to a long vowel monophthong [e:]. In Cockney the diphthong starts with a lower and central vowel, being pronounced. The diphthong is distributed in all three basic positions: eight; plate, play. It can be spelt a: ace, lace; ai: aid, maid; ay: aye, clay; ei: eight, reign, ey: they, grey, ea: break, steak. Exceptionally, there are spellings like goal [goal], bass [bess ], gauge [geuge], halfpenny [helfpeni]. The diphthong also occurs in a small number of French loan words ending in et or 6: ballet, bouquet, chalet, cafe, fiancé, attaché, resume. The diphthong starts with a central mid vowel and glides to a back close one. It is a falling, narrow, closing diphthong. It is distributed in all three basic positions: old, gold, flow. It has various spellings: o: old, sold, wo; oa: oak, roast, oe: toe, ow: own, known, row; ou: poultry, dough; eau: beau, bureau, and, exceptionally, au: gauche; oo: brooch; ew: sew; oh: oh. b. [a] is a falling, wide, closing diphthong. It starts as an open, fairly front vowel (in the vicinity of cardinal vowel 4) and glides towards. It is distributed in all three basic positions: ouch, loud, cougar. It can be spelt by ou: oust, doubt, plough, or ow: owl, howl, how and, exceptionally eo in MacLeod.

English Diphthongs

The lax and tense vowels we have looked at so far are monophthongs, sometimes called pure vowels. This is because the tongue and lips are relatively stationary while these vowels are being pronounced - the vowels do not move around in the vowel chart. Diphthongs, on the other hand, move through the chart as they are pronounced: they start at one vowel- position, and move towards another. The word diphthong is from Greek: it means «two vowels», and we write them as two vowels.
Diphthongs are tense vowels; they can be unchecked, and are subject to clipping like the «pure» tense vowels - they can be long or short.
The centering diphthongs occur only in the nonrhotic accents. In the rhotic accents, words such as NEAR SQUARE and CURE are pronounced with a single vowel (monophthong) followed by r.
This is by far the rarest vowel in RP (with a frequency of 0.06% - see Vowel Frequencies) - and is getting rapidly rarer, since words in the CURE set are moving over to THOUGHT, . This happened decades ago in mainstream RP with words such as 'sure' and 'poor', , , And in newer RP and Estuary English all of the old CURE set have gone over to THOUGHT.
Difference between SQUARE and NEAR
You'll hear different pronunciations of these two vowels (for instance, in some accents the disappears and the remaining vowel lengthens) but most accents of English keep them clearly distinguished. On the other hand speakers of English as a foreign language sometimes confuse these vowels, and Icelanders often do.
The Diphthongs
There are 9 diphthongs in English. [Əi, ei, ou, au, iə, uə, ci, eə, əi]
The English diphthongs are stable combination, no syllable division is possible in them. They may form phonological opposition either with monophtongs, diphthongized vowels or with each other.
Eg bed - bid-bade-beard-bowed; letter - latter - later - litter [• 33] is not an English phoneme, but a version of the vowel [c 8]. The first element of the diphthongs, which is called the nucleus, is pronounced distinctly arid clearly. The second element is glide. There are no diphthongs in Uzbek. According to the phonological approach combination of «vowel - + - j» and vice versa, such as the Uzbek uu, u-y, u - o, u-+ a, are considered to be these sequences of a vowel and consonant [y + c] They are not stable combinations but sometimes may be destroyed by the syllable division: cуй-унчі, тий-уліш.
The first element of the diphthongs [əi, ai, au, əi, uə], to a certain degree acoustically resemble the Uzbek vowels [əi u, a] and [y]. Therefore it is not difficult to leach the Uzbeks to pronounce the nucleus of these diphthongs into [j] which is the most usual mistake in the pronunciation of the Uzbeks. There are also two combinations often used which consists of three vowels in English. There are: [əi, auα] them may be regarded as diphthongs and tile third consists of the vowel. Usually they are called trip tongs. But there is no trip tongs in Uzbek.
1.4 Consonants
Consonants are speech sounds in the pronunciation of which noise is heard. The degrees of noise are different There are consonants 'in the production of which only noise is heard, there are consonants in the production of which noise and voice are heard and there are consonants in the production of which voice divvails over noise, but the fact is that noise in different degrees and forms is always divsent, Consonants do not give periodic voice waves.
The consonants should be classified on the following 3
Principles;
1. The manner of production
2. The active organs employed in the production
3. The place of production
The last division is very important, due to it the parricidal difference in the formation of consonants in English and of consonants in Uzbek may be clearly shown. The system of English consonants consists of 24 consonants. They are: [p, t, k, b, d, g, mf n, 1, n, f, v, s, z, w, j, ð, ə, s, з, ts, w, j] and the problematic phoneme [ju].
The system of Uzbek consonant phonemes consists of 25 phonemes. They are: [п, т, к, б, д, г, м, н, л, нг, в, р, с, й, ш, з, х, ҳ, ф, р, ж, ч, с, қ, ғ]
Some of the English consonants like [ð, ə] have no counterparts ill Uzbek. There are also seine Uzbek consonants which do not exist in the system of the English consonant phonemes. They: are [x, тс,].
Many consonants have their counterparts in the languages ​​compared, but they differ inn their articulation. The difference in the articulation and acoustics »of English arid Uzbek consonants phonemes may be summed up as follows:
1. The English [f, v] are labio - dental fricatives, whereas the Uzbek [4>, B] are bilabial fricatives. They have labio-dental versions in dialects. So Uzbek [B] pronounced in the same way as the English [в], especially in the - middle of words. Pg. қовун, Совунья, Шавло, Далат, шакат, қувват. Uzbek students often substitute [w] for [v]: wine - vine.
2. [T, d, n, s, z] also [1] are alveolar in English. The corresponding consonants in Uzbek are dentals. The English [t, d, n] require apical articulation, while their Uzbek counter - parts are dorsal (dental). The dorsal articulation does riot exists in English.
3. The English [r] is a post - alveolar fricative, while the Uzbek [p] is a post-alveolar rolled (thrilled) consonant.
4. The English [1] phoneme consists of the main member; the clear alveolar [1], used before the vowels a ad semi - vowel and its positional, also dialectal, versions dark [1] which besides, being alveolar is also velar. The latter is used before''consonants and in word final position. The Uzbek [A] is dental consonants.
5. The English [h] is pharyngeal. Uzbek has: a) the velar fricative [x], b) the pharyngeal fricative [х]. The replacement of [h] by • [x] is a phonemic mistake. The English [h] is weak and there is loss friction than in the production of the Uzbek [x].
6. The English affricates [tS, Dз] and fricatives [S, з] are polato-alveolar, while Uzbek [ш, ж] are post-alveolar fricatives and [ж] may be palatalized.
7. The English voiceless [ph, k, s, S, ts] are more energetic
Than the corresponding Uzbek voiceless consonants. In the Uzbek [n, t, k] there is less aspiration than in the corresponding English voiceless plosives. While the English voiced [b, d, g, z, j;] are less energetic than the corresponding Uzbek voiced consonants.
8. We regard the jota combination [ju:] as u separate phoneme in English. It is not a chance combination, it is very often used and there is a letter in the alphabet to denote R In spelling. According to its first element it may be regarded as a consonants phoneme [c + v] may-form phonological opposition
9. The English [j] is a palatal semi-vowel. The Uzbek [й] is a palatal fricative »Gоmp, yet = ет [йт]
10. The English [ðə] are interdentally. The interdentally articulation is unknown in Uzbek. They are extremely difficult for me Uzbek to master.
11. The English sonant [m, 1, n] in word - final position are very sonorous and somewhat prolonged before a pause, especially when they are divceded by a short vowel, whereas the corresponding Uzbek sonant are les & sonorous in Use same position. Comp. Bell, Toni, on; Uzbek: бел, тому, він.
12. The English voiced consonants remain voiced in word final position and before voiceless consonants, while the Uzbek voiceless consonants become devoiced in the.-same position. The Uzbek students of English are apt - to make phonologic mistakes: bed-bet, course-cause.
Word is usually characterized as the smallest naming unit consisting of a definite number of sounds and denoting a definite lexical meaning and exdivssing definite grammatical categories. It usually is a subject-matter of-morphology, which system the form and structure of the word. Iris well known that the neurological system of the language reveals it properties through the! morphemic structure of words. As a part of the grammatical theory morphology faces two set) mental units yogh the language: the morpheme and the word.
Morpheme is known as \ he smallest meaningful unit of the language into which a word may be divided. Eg in the word writ-err-s the root morpheme write exdivsses the lexical meaning of the word, lexical morpheme - er shows the doer of the action denoted by the root morpheme, and the grammatical suffix-s indicates the number of the doers, more than one person is meant, Similar opinion can be sad regarding the following units of the language, such as Finish - ed, courageous, un-divpared - ness: туга лан ма ган лик дано дир, бедаволардан.
Being a meaningful segmental component of the word a morpheme is formed by phonemes but unlike word it is elementary, ie is indivisible into signaller components. There may be zero morphemes, ie the absence of morpheme may indicate a certain lexical or grammatical meaning: Cf: - book-s, hope-hope китобій-китобій-лар, но-Умід-In cases of «students come children come, geese come »the morphs - s, en, and [i:] (of goose) are allomorphs of the morpheme of plurality«-лар »In Uzbek.
Like a word a morpheme is two-facet language unit, an association of a certain sound-pattern. But unlike the word a morpheme is not an autonomous body (unit) and can occur in speech only as a constituent part of the word. It cannot be segmented into smaller units without losing constitutive essence.
The morphemes can be divided into root (free0) morphemes and affixal (bound) morphemes (affixes). A form is said to be free if it may stand without changing its meaning; if not it is a bound form, as it always doubt to something else.
Eg: In the words sportive, elegant morphemes sport, elegant may occur alone as utterances, but the forms-ive, - ant, eleg cannot be used alone without the root morphemes.
The morphemes may be classified in two ways: a) from the semantic point of view, and b) from the structural point of view.
Semantically morphemes fall into two classes: the root morphemes and non-root (affixational) morpheme.
The root morphemes is the lexical nucleus of the word and it they usually exdivss mainly the lexical meaning ie material part of the meaning of the word, while the affixes morphemes can exdivss both lexical and grammatical meanings, this they can be characterized as lexical affixes ( -er) and grammatical suffixes (-s) in «writ-er-s». The lexical suffixes are usually used mainly in word building process to form words (eg help-less, black-ness, teach-er, speak-er, нажот-сиз, қора-лик, ўқіт-ув-чі, сўз-лов- чі) where grammatical suffixes serve to exdivss the grammatical meaning of the word by changing its form (paradigm) (eg speaker) John '- s, (case ending denoting possession) come a (person, number, tense, aspect, mood, active , voice) 3 ^rd person singular divsent simple, indicative mood, active voice. Thus we can say that the grammatical significance of affixes (derivational) morphemes is always combined with their lexical meaning.
eg verb-to write-езмоқ
noun - writer - езувчі
The derivative morpheme «-er» has a grammatical meaning as it serves to distinguish a-noun from a verb and it has a lexical meaning ie the doer of the action. The root of the notional words is classical lexical morphemes.
The affixes (derivational) morphemes include divfixes, suffixes and inflexions (grammatical suffixes). Prefixes and lexical suffixes have word building functions. Together with the root they form the stem of the word. Prefixes divcede the root morpheme (im-personal, un-known, re-write), suffixes follow it (eg: friend-ship, active-ize, readi-ness, дўст-лик, фаоллаш-тир-моқ, Тайер-лик ).
Inflexions word-forming suffixes exdivss different morphological categories.
Structurally morphemes fall under three types: a) free morphemes, b) bound morphemes, c) send-bound morphemes.
A free morpheme is the stem of the word, a great many free morphemes are root morphemes. (Eg London-er, sports-man-ship). A bound morphemes for they are alwaysmake a part of the word. (Eg - ness, - ship, - dom, - dis, - div, un-, чи, паз, - дон, бе-сірий, з,) some root morphemes also belong to the class of bound morphemes.
1.5 The problem of Parts of speech
A word is known as the smallest naming unit of the language. According to L. Bloomfield, word is a minimum free form. Close observation and comparison of words clearly shows that a great number of words have a composite nature and are made up of smaller units, each possessing sound-form and meaning. In other words, the term word denotes the basic unit of a given language resulting from the association of a particular meaning with a particular group of sounds capable of a grammatical employment is a word is therefore simultaneously a semantic, grammatical and phonological unit.
The words of every language fall into classes which are called parts of speech. The problem of parts of speech is one of the controversial problems of modern linguistics. The theoretical side of this problem is the subject matter of the theoretical grammar. therefore we should base our comparison of system of parts of speech on the generally recognized (acknowledged) opinions of grammarians.
In order to make easier to learn the language the grammarians usually divide the word-stock of the language into some subclasses called in linguists the parts of speech.
The main principles of classifying words into parts of speech are: their meaning, form and function, that is to say the words of any language differ from each other in meaning in form and in function. different parts of speech have different lexical meanings.
eg verbs denote process or state; nouns exdivss the names of objects, adjectives their properties ...
Some parts of speech have different grammatical categories. Verbs have the category of mood, tense, aspect, voice, person, number etc., Noun - case, number, adjective - comparison, etc. The parts of speech also differ from each other in their syntactic function; eg verbs are used in the sentence structure as divdicates, nouns-as subjects, adjectives-as attributes etc.
All words of the comparing languages ​​may be divided into three main groups:
1. Notional words
2. Structural words
3. Independent elements
Notional words have distinct lexical meanings and perform independent syntactic functions in the sentence structure, they serve as primary or secondary parts of the sentence. To this group belong the following parts of speech: Noun, verb, adjective, pronouns, numerals, statives and adverbs. It should be kept in mind that statives in Uzbek are otter interchanged with adjectives and not treated as an independent part of speech.
Structural words differ from the notional words semantically their lexical meaning is of a more general character than that of the notional words. Moreover they sometimes altogether avid it that they are independent syntactic function in the sentence structure but serve either to exdivss various relations between the words in a sentence (eg trees in the garden, Tom and Joe, etc.) Or to specify the meaning of the words (eg there is a book on the table, the book on the table is mine, etc.)
The following parts of speech are to be treated as structural words: articles, particles (only, solely, exclusively mainly) divpositions and conjunctions. Articles and divpositions are individual character of English differentiating it from Uzbek as the functions of these parts of speech in Uzbek are performed by other elements of the language.
Independent elements are words which are characterized by their peculiar meanings of various kind. They usually have no grammatical connections with the sentence in which they occur, ie they do not perform any syntactic function in the sentence. eg They certainly will come to the party.
Sometimes independent elements can even serve as sentences themselves; eg Yes, No, Alas.
Independent class of words include modal words, interjections, words of affirmation and negation.
It is noteworthy that the decision of words into parts of speech can be accepted only with certain reservation there are words which cannot be classed among any of the above motioned parts of speech such as a please, anyway ҳар қалай.
Typological categories of English and Uzbek words
The words of any language are characterized by their ability to exdivss definite notions existing in this society, thus changing their forms. Most of the notions existing in the society have common peculiarities, ie they have universal character.
Among the linguistic categories which can be traced in most of the languages ​​of the world we can see the categories which display typologically general character but can be exdivssed in different languages ​​in different ways. Studying these linguistic facts figuring out their similarities and differences is much of importance for the man of letters, especially for the graduates of the language faculties of universities who are going to become English teachers and interdivters in near future.
For instance, such linguistic notions as case, gender person, tense, voice, possession, etc. are of general character for the comparing languages, but they may be exdivssed by typological different means of the language. In this chapter we try to generalize the main means of exdivssing the notions which are of peculiar type of the comparing languages.
1.6 Typological category of case
The system of grammatical forms indicating the syntactic relations of nouns (or pronouns) is usually treated as the category of case, in other words, case is a grammatical form which takes part in the formation of the paradigm of nouns (or pronouns). Grammarians seem to be divided in their opinions as to the case system of the English nouns. The most common view is that they have only two case: common (subject) and possessive (genitive) cases. The common case is characterized by a zero morpheme (suffix) eg child, boy, student, ir. and the possessive case by the indexing is and its phonetic variants as [s] and [z].
The Uzbek бош келішігі (common or subject case) corresponds in meaning and function to the English common case both of them are unmarked member of the case opposition and perform similar syntactic function in the sentence structure.
English common case and other five cases of Uzbek are marked members of the case opposition in both languages. The English possessive case is marked by the stiffly is which can sometimes be substituted by the divposition of (eg my father's room, the room of may father) and therefore is sometimes called of - genitive - case. This case denotes possession of a thing or a person and in Uzbek it has its correspondence in the Uzbek караткіч келішігі which is exdivssed by the case ending suffix num.
Dealing with notion of possession one should keep in mind that in Uzbek this category may be exdivssed not only by the nouns but also their antecedents in the pleonastic phrase such as менинго опамб сізнінг паспортінгізю. In this case we have to face the problem of redundancy and often try to avoid it using the modified noun only which contains the possessive suffix. eg опам кeлді. In this case the suffix of possession can be rendered in English and in Russian by means of special possessive pronouns. eg My sister came. Моя сестра прийшла.
Meaning and functions of the other Uzbek cases may be denoted in Uzbek either by means of divpositions or by word order. For instance the meaning and function of the Uzbek тушум келіші is exdivssed in Uzbek by means of the case ending - ши which denotes the object acted upon and it may be exdivssed in English by means of word order which is characterized in this language to be very strict in comparison with Russian or Uzbek (eg курдам кузінгні колд балога, Кайга борайін Енді давога? - Бачив я твої очі чорні (і захворів) куди мені тепер іти на лікування?) Some English grammarians O. Curme, M. Doutschbein recognize word order in English as dative case.
Dealing with this case one has to keep in mind the structure of the sentence ie the word order in the sentences of the comparing languages ​​- sov (in Uzbek eg мен укамні курдів) and svo (in English I saw my brother »)
The Uzbek Урін пайт келішігі denotes he place of the thing or a person in the space and it can be rendered in English by means of divpositions at, in, an, by, over, above, among, between, behind etc. (EgУ: китобій жавонда. The book is in the bookcase.) It should be kept in mind that most of the English divposition may contain (more) additional meaning denoting the place of the thing or a person. (Сu in - мчі-behind-орқасіда, between-орасіда, under-остіда, etc).
The Uzbek жуналіш келішігі denotes the direction of an action performed by means of the case ending-га. It can be rendered in English also by means of divpositions to, at, into, etc. eg V (йігіт) мактаб - га кетді. He went to school. У қіз Менгу қараді. She looked at me.
Чіқіш келішігі of Uzbek nouns denotes the beginning point of the action denoted by the verb. It can be rendered in English by means of divposition from, out of, from under, etc. eg: У (қіз) Лондон-дан келді. She came from London.У (йігіт) сумкасі-дан қулқопларіні Олді. He took his gloves out of his bag.
1.7 Typological category of gender
The typological category of gender consists of the notions of natural (biological sex and the grammatical (formal) gender. The connection of this category with the natural sex is in the animals and birds. It is displayed by the nouns and pronouns in English. ( But in Russian it can also exdivssed by the adjectives and the past simple tense forms of the verbs.) Most of the Uzbek grammar books do not contain any information about the category of gender of Uzbek nouns, because the authors consider Uzbek nouns not to have this category at all.
In accordance with their lexical meanings the nouns of the comparing nouns may be classed as belonging to the masculine, feminine and neuter genders. Names of male beings are usually masculine (eg: man, husband, boy, son, nephew, bull, ox, ram (whether), cock, stallion - ота, уғіл, еркак, ҳукіз, буқа, новвос, қучқор, хуроз, айғір ) and names of female beings are feminine (eg: woman, lady, girl, daughter, wife, niece, cow heifer (ғунажін), ewe [ju:] (совліқ), hen, mare-ауол, хонім, қіз (бола) , қіз (фарзанд), Хотин, Сігірію, ғунажін, собліқ, макіуон, Байтала). All other nouns are said to be neuter gender (eg: pencil, flower, rain, bird, sky-қалам, гул, уомғір, парранда, қуш , Осмонов).
Gender finds its formal exdivssion in the replacement of nouns by the personal pronouns in the mind person singular, ie, she, it.
However there some nouns in English which may be treated as either makes or females. eg: friend, cousin, doctor, neighbor, worker, etc. The same can be said about the Uzbek terms of kinship eg: жіян, қаріндош, холавачча, қуда, қушні, табіб, ішчі. They are said to be of common (neuter) gender. When there is no need to make distinction of sex the masculine pronoun is used for these nouns.
There are three ways of exdivssing the category of gender in the comparing languages: morphological, syntactical and lexical. Morphological way of exdivssing the category of gender is realized by adding suffixes of gender to the stem of the word. It is a highly developed way of exdivssing gender in Russian by means of suffixes ending in: a) consonants to be masculine, eg: будинок, стіл, свято; b) vowels as - a, - я to be feminine. eg: мама, баба, тітка; c) vowels-o, - e to be neuter. eg: руж'уо, море, вікно і т.п.
English has the only suffix - ess which is used to denote feminine gender.eg: host-ess, actr-ess, waitr-ess, princ-ess, lion-ess, and tiger-ess. Feminine gender in Uzbek may often be exdivssed by means of the suffix-a which is supposed to be of Arabic origin eg: - раїс-а, Вазір-а, шоір-а, Муаллім-а, котіб-а etc.
In order denote the gender syntactic way is also possible. In this case different kinds of combinations of words are formed in which adjunct word (modifier) ​​usually denotes the sex of the head word. eg: man servant - қарол, amid servant-оксоч, boy friend-ўғіл бола уртоқ, girl friend-қіз бола ўртоқ, tom cat-еркак мушук, tabby cat-урғочі мушук, he-wolf-еркак бўрі, she wolf-урғочі бўрі , he goat-така, she goat-вона ечкі, etc. As is seen from these examples English gender denoted by a syntactic combination (man servant she goat can be exdivssed in Uzbek both by syntactically and lexically, (қарол, вона ечкі).
In most cases gender can be exdivssed lexically, ie by the stem of the noun only. eg: father-ота, uncle-АМАКО, niece - (қіз) жіян, sister-in-law-Келін, lord-жаноб, also names of animals, such as mare-бія, tiger - (арка) йўлбарс, ram-қўчқор , etc. Names of people can also denote the gender of the person who owns this name. eg: Arthur, Christopher, John - Аҳмаджон, Баҳодір, Шаҳобіддін denoting male being and Mary, Christine, Nelly, - Сайером, Мехрінісо, Гулоу, etc.
Nouns denoting various kinds of vessels (ship, boat, yacht, life-raft), the noun `car`, as well as the names of countries are sometimes referred to as feminine gender, ie by means of `she`. This fact is usually called personification. eg:
a. Sam joined the famous whaler `Globe`. She was a ship on which any young man would be proud to sail.
b. England prides herself with her greenness and tidiness.
Such nouns as masculine gender. Nouns like `nature, country, mercy, faith, hope, modesty` are used as feminine gender.
1.8 Typological category of plurality
The system of grammatical forms exdivssing grammatical degree (number) is termed (called) the category of plurality. This category. In comparing languages ​​the formants indicating this category are usually added to the stem of nouns (or pronouns). WE should distinguish the logical number (degree) and grammatical number. From the logical point of view proper nouns usually denote a single thing or a person. eg: John, збираючи, London, Тўйтепа, etc. The common nouns are used to denote common type of things, of course, logically more than one.
As we know that the category of plurality denotes more than oneness of things, people or phenomena. Grammatically it can be based in English on the opposition of `zero morpheme and the suffix - s, - en, and root changing abilities of some nouns: ie - s, - en, in Uzbek it is based on the opposition of zero morpheme and suffix - лар, ie - лар. Among the parts of speech this category is distinguished grammatically by nouns, pronouns and verbs. In comparing languages ​​this category may also be denoted lexically by numerals. (Ie two, fifteen, thirty, thousand-іккт, ўн беш, ўттіз, мінг) Numerals are not used in the grammatical plural forms because in the plural form they became substantive zed ie they become nouns (ікктлар, олтічілар).
It should be kept in mind that there are languages ​​having `dual` and `trial` numbers pronouns - ic-wif-we where wit denoted a dual number)
Plurality of nouns. Uzbek nouns and pronouns usually denote this number by means of suffix - лар (eg: одам - ​​лар, муттаҳам-лар) Which can sometimes be used also to denote respect to a person who is spoken about. eg: Дадамлар келділар. (But you have to keep in mind that you can't have mote than one father).
English nouns can exdivss the notion of plurality in the following ways:
a) by means of suffixes:
- S, - es (wife-wives, head-heads)
- En (ox-oxen, child-children, brother-brotheren);
- A datum-data, sanatorium-sanatoria, phenomenon-phenomena) etc.
b) by changing the root vowel (man-men, goose-geese)
Plurality of verbs The English verbs can denote the notion of plurality in the following ways:
a) by opposing the finite verbs in the third person singular to the other forms with zero morpheme: live-s live #
b) by means of suppletive forms of auxiliary verbs:
am, is-are; was-were; have-has-had;
The Uzbek verbs usually exdivss plurality by means of the following suffixes:
a) - лар (келді) лар;
б) - Міз, - сиз, - гніз, ділар (бору-Міз, келаділар);
з) - ш, - іш (кел-ішді);
This category can be exdivssed by means of personal pronouns in both languages; Cl.: I-we; me-us; he / she / it-they; In Uzbek: мен-бізж сен-сізлар; у-улар.
Lexically this category may be exdivssed in both languages ​​with the help of numerals. eg: anmy-қзніш, dual-іккілік, majority-кўпчілік, family-оіла, pair-жуфт, double-іккі (лантірілган), etc.
Plurality can sometimes be exdivssed by means of divpositions (between, among-орасіда, ўртасіда) _adverbs (arm-in-arm-йўлланіліб), indefinite pronouns (some-бир неча, Анча, біроз), verbs (join-қўшілмоқ бірлашмоқ, gathe -тўпламоқ), get together - йіғіліқ unite - бірлашмоқ) also by quantitative markers (two-seater, many staged, two-storeyed): and in Uzbek (кўпхад, қўшаріқ, учкўпрік).
2.9. Typological category of person
The category of person should be dealt with in close connection with the category of number (plurality). Because in the languages ​​of Indo-European family these categories are exdivssed by one and the same morpheme simultaneously ie a morpheme denoting number at the same time exdivsses person as well. For instance, in Latin the morpheme-n + in such forms as amant, habent, Legunt, amabant, habebunt, etc. exdivsses simultaneously the third person and the plural number.

In the comparing languages ​​the category of person is a characteristic feature of pronouns and verbs. They (languages) make distinction between the three classes of personal pronouns denoting respectively the person (s) spoken to (the second person) and the person (s) (or things) spoken about (the third person).
singular plural
1-person-the speaker the speaker and same other people
2-person-a person spoken to more than one people spoken to
3-person-a person of a thing spoken about some people or things spoken about
The category of person in verbs is redivsented by the 1 ^st, 2 ^nd, 3 ^rd person and it exdivsses the relations between the speaker, the person or people spoken to and other person or people spoken about. However this system doesn't hold good for the modern English verb and this is for two reasons:
1) there is no distinction of persons in the plural number. Thus the form live may within the plural number be connected with a subject of any person eg
you} live
we
they
2) there is no distinction of numbers in the 1-and 2 - person. Thus the form «live» in these person may refer to both one and more than one subject. Thus the opposition all other persons exdivsses relation of the 3 ^rd with any person of both numbers ie stem-s \ stem - i. The marked member of the position differs greatly from that of imparked in form and in meaning, It should be kept in mind that in the Subjunctive mood that form «live» denotes any person of both numbers.
The ending 's' having four meanings to exdivss simultaneously is of course a synthetic feature standing rather by itself in the general structure of Modern English.
There a special subclass of the English verbs which do not fit into the system of person and number described above and they must be treated separately both in a practical study of the language and in theoretical analysis. They are called modal verbs 'can, may, must' etc. Being delective verbs they do not admit any suffix to their stem and do not denote any person or number and usually accompany the notional verbs in speech giving them additional meanings of notions as ability permission, necessity or obligation etc.
The verb «be» has a system of its own both in the divsent indicative and in the past

I	Am	Was
He	Is	Was
She	Is	Was
It	Is	Was
You	Are	Were
They	Are	Were

There is own more special class of the English verbs called impersonal verbs. Having the suffix - s in the third person singular of the divsent simple they do not denote any person or thing as the doer of the action. Such verbs usually denote natural phenomena such as to rain, to hail to snow to drizzle, to thunder, to lighten, to warm up, eg it often rains in autumn. It is thundering and lightening.
The personal system of the Uzbek verbs is as follows

Indic mood	Person	Singular	Plural
Past	I	Bordim	bordik
	II	Bording	Bordinrizlar
	III	Bordi	Bordilar borishdi
Present	I	boraman	Boramiz
	II	Boras an	Borasiz (lar)
	III	Boradi	Boradilar
Future	I	Boraman bormoqchiman	Boramiz bormoqchimiz
	II	Borasan bormpqchisan	Boramiz bormoqchimiz
	III	Boradi bormoqchi	Boradilar borishmoqchi
Imperative mood	I	Boray	Boraylik
	II	Borgin	Boringlar, boringiz
	III	Borishsin	Boringizlar

In Uzbek we have no the so called modal verbs and impersonal verbs as it is understood in English or Russian (дощить, смеркає, темніє, похолодало). The functions of the modal verbs are performed in Uzbek by means of the adjectives such as зарур, Керак, даркор, лозім etc. As to the impersonal verbs in Uzbek we use the so called impersonal verbs which are combined only with one and the nouns denoting the names of natural phenomena, such as кор, емгір, дув, etc. eg: Емгір егаді, чакмок чакді.
Dealing with the category of person attention must be to the use of the pronominal forms in transposition. The value of such 'metaphors' may be traced in many modern languages. The first to be mentioned in English is the use of the personal pronouns 'we, you, they' in patterns where they are synonymous with the formal generic 'one' which denotes anyone who occurs in a definite situation. Semantically it corresponds to the Uzbek generic words as 'одам, киши, інсон. eg:
You (we) don '(know what to do in such a situation.
One doesn't know what to do in such a situation.
Бундала холатда нима кілішінгні білмайсан киши
Інсон зоті вибірки яратгані унутіб фарзанді Томон інтіладі.
The so called 'editorial' we '(Lat. plural is modestial) is well for instance, as used in many modern languages ​​by authors of scientific papers, monographs or articles in newspapers, etc. The pronoun 'we' is commonly used in proverbs, eg:
We shall see what we shall see.
We never know the value of the water till the well is dry,
Kuduq qurimaguncha (ariqdan oqqan) suvni qadrini bilmaymiz
Compare the Uzbek proverbs which are also addressed to anyone who appears in a situation, eg
Nima eksang shuni o'rasan.
Sar qdrini zargar biladi.
Bilib turib bilmaslikka olamiz.
Exdivssive affect of great subtlety will be found in the use of the pronoun 'we' in such examples;
'I say' said Hurstwood, as they came up the theatre lobby, we are exceedingly charming this evening.
'How do we feel today?' said the doctor facing the patient.
2.10. Typological categories of tense and aspect
Tense is the form of the verb which indicates time of the action from the point of view of the moment of speech, hi English we distinguish three tenses; past, divsent and past.
Past tense denotes an action which has taken place at a definite time before the moment of speech.
Present tense denotes a regular or recurrent action happening around the moment of speech.
Future tense denotes an action which will or going to happen after the moment of speech.
The English verbs also distinguish the category of aspect continuous process. The notion of aspect can also be described as a form of the verb that shows habituality, continuance or completion of the action or state exdivssed by the root of the verb. In Uzbek grammars aspect is not studied as a separate category of the verb as it not always exdivssed distinctly as it seems because of the lack, of the analytical forms.
In the comparing languages ​​the categories of tense and aspect are so closely merged together that it is impossible to treat them separately. One and the same form of the verb serves to exdivss tense and aspect at the same time and therefore they should be regarded as a 'tense - aspect forms' of the verb.
In the comparing languages ​​we distinguish three aspects of the verb forms; Simple (Common or Indefinite), Continuous and Perfect aspects. Combining with all the tense forms of the verb they form the so called 'tense aspect forms of the verb.
Present simple exdivsses a usual, recurrent or habitual action that takes place in our everyday life, eg
The sun.rises in (lie East.
We love our mothers.
Children go to school at the age of 6.
'They call me Nancy' r said the girl.
I know him well (Stative action)
The verbs in the divsent simple may often be accompanied by adverbs of frequency such as often, sometimes, usually, seldom, never, etc. indicating habitual action. The main indicator of the English verb forms in the divsent simple is the opposite 'live | live - s'. (See the divceding chapter.)
As has been mentioned above Past simple denotes an action which happened at a definite time before the moment of speech. Definite time of the action may be clarified by means of such time exdivssions as 'yesterday, last week, two years ago, when I was a child, etc. The main indicator of the verb form in the past simple of the English verbs is the formant '-ed' (for the regular verbs) and the change of the root vowels (or consonants) for the irregular verbs, eg; live - d, help - ed, give - gave, send - sent.
(As to the verb forms in Uzbek see the table in the chapter dealing with the category of person.)
The verbs in the Future Simple, as has been mentioned above, indicate the action which will or going to happen after the moment of speech. The main indicators of the future action is the auxiliaries - will (shall), and going to 'which usually divcede the infinitive,
eg: Give me your suitcase, please, I will carry it for you.
I'm going to visit my grandfather on Sunday.
Present Continuous denotes an action happening now, ie at the moment of speech. In English the divdicate verb is formed by means of the auxiliary verb
(Be - Participle I.) of the notional verb which correspond to the Uzbek verb forms in the example of the verb 'bor':

I person	Singular	Аяпман Мокдаман
	Plural	Аяпміз Мокдаміз
II person	Singular	Аяпсан Мокдасан
	Plural	Аяпсіз Мокдасіз
III person	Singular	Аяпті Мокда
	Plural	Аяпчілар Мокдалар Ішмокда

The Present Continuous exdivsses three ideas;
1) an activity happening now, ie at the moment of speech.
Cf.I It is raining. The child is crying. They are looking at you.
2) an activity happening around now, but perhaps not at the moment of speech.
Cf.; I'm reading a very interesting book on astrology these days.
3) a planned future arrangement.
Cf. I'm leaving for London next week,
Past Continuous of the English verb is formed by means of the combination of 'was (were) ~ P1 of the notional verb and denotes an action happening (in progress) at a definite time in the past. Definite time may be exdivssed by means of time exdivssions or by a. clause of time connected to the principle one with the; conjunctions while and when. In Uzbek in the past continuous the verbs may take the suffixes.
eg: I was having a shower when you rang me up (at seven o'clock /.
Compare: I was doing my homework at 7.00 last night. / Past Continuous - I was in the middle of the action.)
b) I did my homework last night. / Past Simple - I started and finished)
Future Continuous is formed by means of the auxiliary 'will (or shall) be - PI f of the notional verb and exdivsses an action taking place in progress at a definite time after the moment of speech.
Cf.: I shall be waiting for you at the arrival hall at J o'clock (when you plane arrive at the airport).
As is seen from this example Uzbek future continuous is exdivssed with the help of the suffix '-етган' and auxiliary verb булл-мок.
Perfect aspect denotes an action that as happened before now. Present Perfect relates past actions and states to the divsent. In a sense Present Perfect is a divsent tense. It looks back from the divsent into tрe past and exdivsses a completed action up to the divsent moment,
I've travelled a lot in Africa.
It can also exdivss an action or state which began in the past and continues to the divsent.
Present Perfect Continuous is used to exdivss a) an activity which continues to the divsent.

Conclusion
Now let me sum up my qualification work. My qualification work consists of for parts. The tasks and objectives are given in introduction. The idea of ​​my work is given in the main part, where showed the novelty of the work, which contains the comparative analyses of the English language with the Uzbek language. The similarities in gender in the English language and in the Uzbek language are given in the qualification work, compared the tenses which exist in the English language with Uzbek language. The Present Continuous Tense exdivsses the prolongation of the action.
Example: I am sitting in Uzbek language to exdivss this tense is used only simple tense Мен утіраман.
Different examples are given in the work which shows the comparative analyses of both languages.
In conclusion summed up my qualification work, and suggest to use the material in the lyceums and universities.

Bibliography
1. Modern English in Action, Henry I. Christ, DC Heath and company, Boston 2001.
2. Mountains are climbing, study book, Boston 2003y.
3. English phonetic, AA Abduazizov видавництво «Укітувчі» Т. 1972
4. Reference guide to English, Alice Maclin, USA Washington 1994
5. Improve your sentence, Ann M. Sala, McCraw-Hill, USA. 1999y
6. Language for daily use Mildred A Dawson New York, 2001y
7. New English voyages in English, Francis B. Connors, Loyola University. Press, Chicago 1991y
8. Writing skills, Suzanne Chance, Clencoe, McCraw-Hill. New York
9. Reading and writing, Natasha Haugnes
10. Contemporary English, Mechella Perrott, contemporary publisher group, Illinois USA.
11. Beginning English writing skills, Mone Scherago, National textbook company, Illinois USA.
12. Lectures of comparative typology, C. Satimov, M. Просвітництво 1991
13. Comparative typology VD Arakin, M. «Prosveshenie» 1991
14. Comparative grammar, JI